Choosing Between Transit VIF and Private VIF in AWS Direct Connect

Overview

As organizations adopt cloud-first strategies, network connectivity becomes critical for performance, security, and cost optimization. While AWS provides multiple ways to connect on-premises data centres to the cloud, AWS Direct Connect (DX) is often the go-to option for enterprises that need dedicated, low-latency, and high-bandwidth connectivity.

Within AWS Direct Connect, one of the key decisions customers face is whether to use a Transit Virtual Interface (Transit VIF) or a Private Virtual Interface (Private VIF). Both options serve unique purposes, and understanding the differences can help you design the right network architecture for your workloads.

In this blog, we’ll break down what AWS Direct Connect is, explore the role of Transit VIF and Private VIF, compare them across multiple dimensions, and share guidance on when to use each.

AWS Direct Connect

AWS Direct Connect (DX) is a network that establishes a dedicated physical connection between your on-premises network (or colocation facility) and AWS. Unlike a VPN over the public internet, AWS Direct Connect offers:

• Consistent low-latency performance
• High bandwidth (1 Gbps, 10 Gbps, 100 Gbps options)
• Reduced data transfer costs compared to internet-based transfers
• Improved security since traffic bypasses the public internet

Once the physical connection is provisioned, you create Virtual Interfaces (VIFs) on top of it to connect to different AWS services. This is where the choice between Private VIF and Transit VIF comes into play.

Private Virtual Interface (Private VIF)

A Private VIF connects your on-premises network directly to VPCs using private IP addresses. It establishes connectivity between your Direct Connect and a Virtual Private Gateway (VGW) or an AWS Transit Gateway (TGW) attached to your Amazon VPC.

Key characteristics:

• Connects on-premises ↔ VPC directly
• Uses private IP addresses for routing
• Suitable for workloads requiring low-latency access to Amazon EC2, Amazon RDS, etc.
• Requires one Private VIF per VGW unless you aggregate using TGW

Example use case:
A financial services company with an on-premises data centre running trading applications wants to connect securely to its Amazon VPC hosting an Amazon RDS database. A Private VIF ensures a direct, private, and predictable connection.

Transit Virtual Interface (Transit VIF)

A Transit VIF is designed to work with an AWS Transit Gateway (TGW). Instead of connecting to individual Amazon VPCs, it connects your on-premises network to an AWS Transit Gateway, providing access to multiple VPCs and AWS regions.

Key characteristics:

• Connects on-premises ↔ AWS Transit Gateway (TGW)
• Provides hub-and-spoke connectivity to multiple VPCs
• Reduces the need to manage multiple Private VIFs
• Supports inter-region and multi-account architectures
• Ideal for large-scale enterprises with many VPCs

Example use case:
A global e-commerce company runs workloads across 15 VPCs in multiple AWS accounts and needs centralized on-premises connectivity. A Transit VIF connected to TGW simplifies management and routing.

When to Use Private VIF?

• You have only one or a few VPCs to connect.
• Workloads are localized in a single region.
• You want simpler and lower-cost connectivity.
• Example: A startup connecting its on-premises ERP system to a single Amazon VPC hosting applications.

When to Use Transit VIF?

• You operate at enterprise scale with many VPCs across accounts.
• You need multi-region or global network connectivity.
• You want to simplify network management with a hub-and-spoke model.
• Example: A multinational company running 20+ VPCs across 3 regions, needing centralized access for analytics, applications, and shared services.

Cost Considerations

While Private VIF and Transit VIF incur AWS Direct Connect port-hour charges and data transfer costs, Transit VIF introduces AWS Transit Gateway data processing charges. For enterprises with large-scale deployments, these costs may be justified by the simplicity and scalability gained. For smaller setups, Private VIF is more economical.

Conclusion

Private VIF and Transit VIF are crucial in extending your on-premises network into AWS.

• Choose Private VIF if you have a small-scale setup, want to connect to a few VPCs, or prioritize cost efficiency.
• Choose Transit VIF if you need scalable, multi-VPC, multi-region connectivity with centralized management.

Ultimately, the decision comes down to your network size, complexity, and growth plans. Many organizations start with Private VIF for simplicity, then migrate to Transit VIF as their AWS footprint expands.

By carefully analyzing your workloads and future needs, you can design an AWS Direct Connect architecture that ensures performance, reliability, and scalability.

Drop a query if you have any questions regarding Private VIF or Transit VIF and we will get back to you quickly.

About CloudThat