AWS Load Balancers: A Comprehensive Comparison for Optimal Use Cases

Introduction

Amazon Web Services (AWS) offers various load balancing solutions to distribute incoming traffic across multiple servers or instances. These load balancers help to maintain a high availability and fault tolerance in your application infrastructure, ensuring seamless performance even during peak demand periods.

In this blog post, we’ll dive into a detailed comparison of the various AWS load balancers, examining their features, advantages, and use cases to help you choose the right solution for your needs.

Classic Load Balancer (CLB)

The Classic Load Balancer, formerly Elastic Load Balancer (ELB), is a legacy load balancing solution that distributes incoming traffic between Amazon EC2 instances using either the round-robin or least outstanding requests algorithms.

Key Features:

• Supports Layer 4 (TCP/SSL) and Layer 7 (HTTP/HTTPS) traffic
• Offers sticky sessions, health checks, and CloudWatch metrics

Use Cases:

• Simple web applications with low traffic
• Legacy applications that do not require advanced routing features

Pros:

• Simple to set up and manage
• Cost-effective for small-scale deployments

Cons:

• Limited routing capabilities
• It does not support WebSocket or HTTP/2

Application Load Balancer (ALB)

The Application Load Balancer is a Layer 7 load balancer designed to handle HTTP and HTTPS traffic. It offers advanced routing features, allowing you to distribute traffic based on content, host, or path.

Key Features:

• Supports HTTP/HTTPS traffic
• Advanced routing rules based on content, host, or path
• Integration with AWS services like ECS, EKS, and Lambda
• Offers sticky sessions, health checks, and CloudWatch metrics

Use Cases:

• Microservices or container-based applications
• Applications that require advanced routing rules or WebSocket support

Pros:

• Advanced routing capabilities
• Better performance compared to CLB
• Supports WebSocket and HTTP/2

Cons:

• Not suitable for Layer 4 (TCP/SSL) traffic
• More expensive than CLB

Network Load Balancer (NLB)

The Network Load Balancer is a Layer 4 load balancer designed for high-performance applications that require low latency and high throughput. It operates at the connection level, making it ideal for TCP and UDP traffic.

Key Features:

• Supports Layer 4 (TCP/UDP) traffic
• High throughput and low latency
• Preserves the source IP address of the client
• Offers health checks and CloudWatch metrics

Use Cases:

• Applications that require low-latency and high-throughput performance
• Applications that use Layer 4 protocols (TCP/UDP)

Pros:

• High performance with low latency
• Handles millions of requests per second
• Suitable for high-traffic applications

Cons:

• Limited to Layer 4 traffic
• No advanced routing capabilities like ALB

Gateway Load Balancer (GWLB)

The Gateway Load Balancer is a specialized load balancer designed for deploying, scaling, and managing third-party virtual appliances like firewalls, intrusion prevention systems, and deep packet inspection systems.

Key Features:

• Simplifies virtual appliance deployment and scaling
• Supports Layer 3 traffic
• Integration with other AWS services like Transit Gateway and VPC Ingress Routing

Use Cases:

• Deploying and managing third-party virtual appliances
• Network infrastructure requiring advanced security and compliance features

Pros:

• Simplifies virtual appliance deployment and management
• Supports Layer 3 traffic

Cons:

• Not suitable for general-purpose application load balancing

Conclusion

By comparing each load balancer’s features, advantages, and use cases, you can choose the best load balancing solution for your application infrastructure. Remember that the ideal load balancer for your needs depends on your specific requirements and the nature of your application. With the right choice, you can ensure high availability, fault tolerance, and seamless performance for your users, even during peak demand periods.

About CloudThat