Scaling Time Series Data with TimescaleDB Hypertables

Introduction

Performance and scalability are everything when dealing with time-series data, whether from IoT sensors, financial tickers, or application logs. As data volume increases, your queries may get slower, indexes bloat, and storage expenses increase.

Importance of Partitioning in Time-Series Data

In time-series workloads, this is particularly important because:

• Write performance stays fast – New data only goes into the latest partitions, avoiding the need to scan large historical datasets.
• Queries are more efficient – Most time-series queries target a specific time range, so smaller partitions mean fewer blocks to scan.
• Data retention becomes easier – Old partitions can be dropped or archived without touching newer data.
• Indexes stay lean – Each partition has its own index, avoiding massive single-index bottlenecks.

Without partitioning, a single massive table can slow down writes, inflate indexes, and make even simple queries painfully slow.

Working with Hypertables in TimescaleDB

In PostgreSQL, you could manually create table inheritance structures or declarative partitions for time-series data.

Hypertables in TimescaleDB automate this:

• You define a time column (and optionally a space partition key).
• TimescaleDB uses time ranges to divide your data into smaller child tables.
• It routes incoming inserts to the correct chunk automatically.
• Queries are rewritten internally only to touch relevant chunks.

From the user’s perspective, a hypertable behaves just like a normal table, with the same SQL and indexes, but it’s an optimized partitioned structure behind the scenes.

Example: Creating a Hypertable

Here, Sensor_data is converted into a time-partitioned hypertable.

Best Practices for Partitioning Time-Series Data with Hypertables

Let’s dive into how to get the most out of hypertables.

1. Choose the Right Chunk Time Interval

• The chunk time interval defines how much data goes into each partition (chunk).
• Too small: You will have too many chunks, causing metadata overhead.
• Too large: Queries will need to scan more data, reducing efficiency.

Example:

2. Use Space Partitioning for High Cardinality Sources

If you have many unique devices or sources writing data, consider space partitioning in addition to time partitioning. This creates multiple chunk sets for each time interval, distributing the load.

Example:

This setup partitions by time and device ID, which can help parallelize queries and speed up inserts.

3. Index Wisely for Query Patterns

• Hypertables still benefit from indexes, but you need to choose them carefully:
• Always index the time column for fast range queries.
• Add composite indexes when queries filter by time and another column (e.g., device_id).
• Avoid excessive indexes on high-ingest workloads, as they slow down inserts.

Example:

4. Apply Data Retention Policies

One of the biggest advantages of hypertables is that you can easily drop old chunks. If your system only needs 90 days of data, there’s no reason to keep years of history in your live database.

Example:

This automatically deletes chunks older than 90 days, keeping storage usage predictable.

5. Use Compression for Historical Chunks

TimescaleDB supports native columnar compression for historical data. This can speed up analytical queries and reduce storage by up to 90%.

Example:

Chunks older than 30 days are automatically compacted here.

6. Monitor Chunk Count & Performance

• Too many chunks can lead to planner overhead. Too few can make queries slower.
• To check the count and sizes of chunks, use timescaledb_information.chunks.
• Aim for hundreds, not thousands, of chunks for active datasets.
• Adjust chunk_time_interval if needed.

Example:

Pitfalls to Avoid

• Default chunk interval – TimescaleDB chooses an interval for you by default, however, it might not be the best for your workload. Always measure and adjust.
• Over-indexing – Each index exists on every chunk. Too many indexes multiply the maintenance cost.
• Ignoring parallelism – Without space partitioning, parallel query execution may be limited.
• Mixing schema changes with large tables – Changing column types on hypertables can be expensive. Plan schema carefully before ingestion.

Conclusion

Hypertables take the complexity out of partitioning time-series data, giving you the scalability of a sharded architecture while preserving the simplicity of SQL.

The key best practices boil down to:

• Pick the right chunk size for your workload.
• Combine time and space partitioning when needed.
• Index based on query patterns.
• Automate retention and compression for cost savings.
• Continuously monitor and tune.

Following these guidelines, you can confidently handle billions of time-series rows without losing performance, or sleep.

Drop a query if you have any questions regarding Hypertables and we will get back to you quickly.

About CloudThat