Running AI Workloads at Scale on Kubernetes with GPU Management

Introduction

AI workloads are no longer simple scripts running on a single GPU. They’re complex systems that need to handle unpredictable traffic, expensive resources, and production-grade reliability. Kubernetes is solving that problem – turning AI models into scalable, cost-efficient, cloud-native services.

Real example: an AI Image Classification System that uses Kubernetes to manage GPU workloads, auto-scale under heavy load, and cut cloud costs by more than 90%.

How the AI Image Classification System Works?

User Upload → Load Balancer → Kubernetes Service → Pod → GPU → Response
↡

Queue → KEDA Scaler → New Pods → Auto-scaling

This setup enables real-time image classification at scale while maintaining a dynamic and efficient infrastructure.

Step-by-Step System Flow

1. Model Initialization

When a pod starts up, it loads the ResNet-50 model into GPU memory:

This initialization takes roughly 8–10 seconds as the model loads and the GPU warms up.

2. Handling a Classification Request

When a user uploads an image:

After the Upload:

• The load balancer receives the request.
• Kubernetes Service routes it to an available pod.
• The Flask app handles the request and pre-processes the image (resizing and normalizing).
• The GPU runs inference, typically in 200ms.
• The response is formatted and sent back, with a total latency of ~300ms. This means users receive near real-time classification, even during traffic spikes.

3. Auto-Scaling in Action

The system utilizes KEDA and HPA (Horizontal Pod Autoscaler) to scale intelligently, and Karpenter to scale nodes as needed.

• Low Traffic (1–5 req/min) → 1 pod running → CPU: 20%, GPU: 15% → Action: No scaling
• Traffic Spike (100+ req/min) → Queue builds up (>5 items) → KEDA detects backlog → Scales 1 → 5 pods in 30 seconds → New pods run on spot instances (60% cheaper)
• Peak Traffic (500+ req/min) → CPU > 70%, GPU > 80% → HPA scales to 20 pods → Each pod handles ~25 req/min → Latency stays <500ms

4. Cost Optimization Mechanics

GPU workloads can quickly consume cloud budgets. How this setup avoids that efficiently:

• Spot instances handle non-critical loads (60% cheaper).
• Node draining ensures no requests are lost when a spot instance is reclaimed.
• Scale-to-zero saves cost during idle hours.

That cold-start trade-off is worth it, it can significantly reduce monthly GPU bills.

Real-Time Monitoring Dashboard

Everything is monitored continuously in Grafana and Prometheus.

Request Flow:

• Requests/sec: 45
• Queue length: 2
• Active pods: 4

Resource Usage:

• GPU: 78%
• Memory: 2.1GB / 4GB
• CPU: 65%

Performance Metrics:

• P95 Latency: 450ms
• Success Rate: 99.8%
• Error Rate: 0.2%

Failure Scenarios & Recovery

Pod Crashes

Kubernetes detects the crash within 10 seconds and automatically starts a replacement pod. Other pods handle the load in the meantime, resulting in zero downtime.

GPU Memory Exhaustion

If the GPU runs out of memory, the pod restarts and reloads the model. Proper resource limits prevent cascading failures.

Traffic Surges (Black Friday Scenario)

Cost Breakdown – Real Numbers

Without Kubernetes:

• 4 × g4dn.xlarge (24/7): $2,400/month
• 70% idle time = $1,680 wasted

With Kubernetes:

• Average 2 pods running = $600/month
• 70% spot usage = $420 savings
• Final cost ≈ $180/month
• Savings: ~92.5%

Development Workflow

Deploying a New Model Version

After one hour of validation, promote it to full traffic if metrics look healthy.

Debugging and Monitoring

Why This Works So Well?

Kubernetes provides:

• Self-healing: Pods restart automatically.
• Load balancing: Requests are spread evenly.
• Cost efficiency: Scale to zero and spot instances.
• Predictable performance: Autoscaling maintains stable latency.

AI-specific advantages:

• GPU sharing for multiple models.
• Batch processing via queues.
• Canary rollouts for model versioning.
• GPU monitoring through Prometheus exporters.

With this result, we have an AI system that behaves like any other web app – scalable, reliable, and cost-effective – but with the horsepower to run deep learning at scale.

Conclusion

AI at scale isn’t just about bigger models or faster hardware, it’s about smarter orchestration. Kubernetes brings structure to the complexity of running AI in production.

The real takeaway is that teams can focus on building and improving AI systems, while Kubernetes handles everything else – from resource allocation to scaling and optimization behind the scenes.

Drop a query if you have any questions regarding Kubernetes and we will get back to you quickly.

About CloudThat