Choosing Between VACUUM FULL and VACUUM ANALYZE in PostgreSQL

Overview

PostgreSQL’s MVCC (Multi-Version Concurrency Control) architecture enables high-performance concurrent operations, but it comes with a maintenance cost. As rows are updated or deleted, dead tuples accumulate, bloating tables and degrading query performance. Without proper maintenance, even well-designed databases can suffer from slow queries, wasted disk space, and suboptimal query plans.

Two critical maintenance commands, VACUUM FULL and VACUUM ANALYZE, address these issues but serve fundamentally different purposes. Understanding when and how to use each is essential for maintaining a healthy PostgreSQL environment. This post explores both commands through a maintenance decision matrix, helping you choose the right tool for your specific scenario.

Understanding VACUUM FULL

• Purpose and Mechanism

VACUUM FULL is PostgreSQL’s most aggressive space reclamation tool. Unlike standard VACUUM, which marks dead tuples as reusable, VACUUM FULL physically rewrites the entire table, removing all dead space and compacting data into the smallest possible footprint.

The operation creates a new copy of the table, transfers live rows, drops the old version, and rebuilds all indexes. This process returns freed space directly to the operating system rather than keeping it within the table for future use.

Advantages:

• Maximum disk space recovery
• Eliminates table bloat completely
• Improves sequential scan performance on heavily bloated tables

Use Cases

VACUUM FULL is appropriate when:

• Table bloat exceeds 40-50% and disk space is critical
• Tables have undergone massive DELETE operations (e.g., data purges)
• Maintenance windows allow for extended downtime
• Standard VACUUM has proven insufficient for space recovery

Understanding VACUUM ANALYZE

• Purpose and Mechanism

VACUUM ANALYZE combines two operations: standard VACUUM (which marks dead tuples as reusable) and ANALYZE (which updates table statistics for the query planner). This command removes dead tuple references, prevents transaction ID wraparound, and refreshes statistics that PostgreSQL uses to generate optimal query plans.

Unlike VACUUM FULL, this operation works in-place without rewriting the table. Freed space remains within the table structure for reuse by future INSERT or UPDATE operations.

• Advantages:
• Minimal locking, concurrent reads and writes continue
• Fast execution, suitable for regular maintenance
• Updates query planner statistics simultaneously
• No additional disk space required
• Use Cases

VACUUM ANALYZE is ideal for:

• Regular maintenance schedules (daily or weekly)
• Production environments requiring high availability
• Tables with moderate update/delete activity
• Situations where query performance degradation is observed
• Maintaining accurate statistics for the query optimizer

Postgres Maintenance Matrix

Best Practices

When to Use Each Command

VACUUM ANALYZE:

• Schedule during off-peak hours as part of routine maintenance
• Run after bulk data modifications
• Execute when query performance degrades unexpectedly
• Use as the default maintenance approach

VACUUM FULL:

• Reserve for major maintenance windows
• Apply after large-scale data purges or migrations
• Use when disk space exhaustion is imminent
• Consider pg_repack or pg_squeeze as online alternatives

Common Mistakes to Avoid

1. Running VACUUM FULL routinely: This creates unnecessary downtime and resource consumption
2. Ignoring autovacuum: Disabling autovacuum without manual maintenance leads to severe bloat
3. Not monitoring bloat metrics: Use pg_stat_user_tables to track dead tuples before problems escalate
4. Forgetting to ANALYZE after VACUUM FULL: Statistics aren’t automatically updated
5. Insufficient disk space: VACUUM FULL requires temporary space equal to the table size

Autovacuum Considerations

PostgreSQL’s autovacuum daemon automatically performs VACUUM ANALYZE based on activity thresholds. While convenient, autovacuum may not keep pace with high-velocity workloads. Monitor autovacuum effectiveness through pg_stat_user_tables and adjust thresholds (autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor, autovacuum_vacuum_threshold) as needed.

Conclusion

VACUUM FULL and VACUUM ANALYZE serve distinct roles in PostgreSQL maintenance. VACUUM ANALYZE is your routine maintenance tool, fast, non-blocking, and statistics-aware, suitable for regular operations. VACUUM FULL is the emergency response for severe bloat when disk space recovery justifies downtime.

Drop a query if you have any questions regarding VACUUM FULL or VACUUM ANALYZE and we will get back to you quickly.

About CloudThat